Nouriel Roubini has officially left the “hedging your bets on the
economy” camp. He has declared the markets to be frothy because super
low dollar borrowing rates have turned the greenback into the funding
currency for the carry trade.
Far more important than the peppy rally in the stock market is the
resumption of early 2007 style risk taking in the credit markets. As
Gillian Tett of the Financial Times noted last week:
Earlier this month, I received a sobering e-mail from a
senior, recently-retired banker. This particular man, a veteran of the
credit world, had just chatted with ex-colleagues who are still in the
markets – and was feeling deeply shocked.
“Forget about the events of the past 12 months … the punters are
back punting as aggressively as ever,” he wrote. “Highly leveraged
short-term trades are back in vogue as players … jostle to load up on
everything from Reits [real estate investment trusts] and commercial
property, commodities, emerging markets and regular stocks and bonds.
“Oh, I am sure the banks’ public relations people will talk about
the subdued atmosphere in banking, but don’t you believe it,” he
continued bitterly, noting that when money is virtually free – or, at
least, at 0.5 per cent – traders feel stupid if they don’t leverage up.
“Any sense of control is being chucked out of the window. After the
dotcom boom and bust it took a good few years for the market to get its
collective mojo back [but] this time it has taken just a few months,”
he added. He finished with a despairing question: “Was October 2008
just a dress rehearsal for the crash when this latest bubble bursts?”
In other words, everyone seems to be in on this bubble except most
borrowers in the real economy. But that wasn’t the main objective…it
was to reflate asset prices to save the global banking system…by
rerunning the same movie that drove it off the cliff in the first place
(well, this is a sequel, so there are some minor plot changes, like the
dollar rather than the yen as the basis for the carry trade).
From Roubini in the Financial Times:
Since March there has been a massive rally in all sorts
of risky assets… and an even bigger rally in emerging market asset
classes (their stocks, bonds and currencies). At the same time, the
dollar has weakened sharply, while government bond yields have gently
increased but stayed low and stable.
This recovery in risky assets is in part driven by better economic
fundamentals…. Whether the recovery is V-shaped, as consensus believes,
or U-shaped and anaemic as I have argued, asset prices should be moving
gradually higher.
But while the US and global economy have begun a modest recovery,
asset prices have gone through the roof since March in a major and
synchronised rally….Risky asset prices have risen too much, too soon
and too fast compared with macroeconomic fundamentals.
So what is behind this massive rally? Certainly it has been helped
by a wave of liquidity from near-zero interest rates and quantitative
easing. But a more important factor fuelling this asset bubble is the
weakness of the US dollar, driven by the mother of all carry trades.
The US dollar has become the major funding currency of carry trades as
the Fed has kept interest rates on hold and is expected to do so for a
long time. Investors who are shorting the US dollar to buy on a highly
leveraged basis higher-yielding assets and other global assets are not
just borrowing at zero interest rates in dollar terms; they are
borrowing at very negative interest rates – as low as negative 10 or 20
per cent annualised – as the fall in the US dollar leads to massive
capital gains on short dollar positions.
Let us sum up: traders are borrowing at negative 20 per cent rates
to invest on a highly leveraged basis on a mass of risky global assets
that are rising in price due to excess liquidity and a massive carry
trade. Every investor who plays this risky game looks like a genius –
even if they are just riding a huge bubble financed by a large negative
cost of borrowing – as the total returns have been in the 50-70 per
cent range since March.
People’s sense of the value at risk (VAR) of their aggregate
portfolios ought, instead, to have been increasing due to a rising
correlation of the risks between different asset classes, all of which
are driven by this common monetary policy and the carry trade. In
effect, it has become one big common trade – you short the dollar to
buy any global risky assets.
Yet, at the same time, the perceived riskiness of individual asset
classes is declining as volatility is diminished due to the Fed’s
policy of buying everything in sight – witness its proposed $1,800bn
(£1,000bn, €1,200bn) purchase of Treasuries, mortgage- backed
securities (bonds guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise such
as Fannie Mae) and agency debt. By effectively reducing the volatility
of individual asset classes, making them behave the same way, there is
now little diversification across markets – the VAR again looks low.
So the combined effect of the Fed policy of a zero Fed funds rate,
quantitative easing and massive purchase of long-term debt instruments
is seemingly making the world safe – for now – for the mother of all
carry trades and mother of all highly leveraged global asset bubbles.
While this policy feeds the global asset bubble it is also feeding a new US asset bubble….
The reckless US policy that is feeding these carry trades is forcing
other countries to follow its easy monetary policy….This is keeping
short-term rates lower than is desirable. Central banks may also be
forced to lower interest rates through domestic open market operations.
Some central banks, concerned about the hot money driving up their
currencies, as in Brazil, are imposing controls on capital inflows.
Either way, the carry trade bubble will get worse: if there is no forex
intervention and foreign currencies appreciate, the negative borrowing
cost of the carry trade becomes more negative. If intervention or open
market operations control currency appreciation, the ensuing domestic
monetary easing feeds an asset bubble in these economies. So the
perfectly correlated bubble across all global asset classes gets bigger
by the day.
But one day this bubble will burst, leading to the biggest
co-ordinated asset bust ever: if factors lead the dollar to reverse and
suddenly appreciate – as was seen in previous reversals, such as the
yen-funded carry trade – the leveraged carry trade will have to be
suddenly closed as investors cover their dollar shorts. A stampede will
occur as closing long leveraged risky asset positions across all asset
classes funded by dollar shorts triggers a co-ordinated collapse of all
those risky assets – equities, commodities, emerging market asset
classes and credit instruments.
Why will these carry trades unravel? First, the dollar cannot fall
to zero and at some point it will stabilise; when that happens the cost
of borrowing in dollars will suddenly become zero, rather than highly
negative, and the riskiness of a reversal of dollar movements would
induce many to cover their shorts. Second, the Fed cannot suppress
volatility forever – its $1,800bn purchase plan will be over by next
spring. Third, if US growth surprises on the upside in the third and
fourth quarters, markets may start to expect a Fed tightening to come
sooner, not later. Fourth, there could be a flight from risk prompted
by fear of a double dip recession or geopolitical risks, such as a
military confrontation between the US/Israel and Iran. As in 2008, when
such a rise in risk aversion was associated with a sharp appreciation
of the dollar, as investors sought the safety of US Treasuries, this
renewed risk aversion would trigger a dollar rally at a time when huge
short dollar positions will have to be closed.
This unraveling may not occur for a while, as easy money and
excessive global liquidity can push asset prices higher for a while.
But the longer and bigger the carry trades and the larger the asset
bubble, the bigger will be the ensuing asset bubble crash. The Fed and
other policymakers seem unaware of the monster bubble they are
creating. The longer they remain blind, the harder the markets will
fall.
The Journal has a less apocalyptic story on the very same topic: “Dollar Calls the Tune for Stocks, Bonds, Oil“:
A joke making the rounds among stock investors is that
they’ve all become currency traders. In recent weeks, the relationship
between moves in the dollar and stocks has been incredibly tight; as
the dollar rises, stocks fall and vice versa.
And it isn’t just stocks. Links between the dollar, corporate bonds,
energy prices and gold have grown closer. Traders and analysts point to
one factor as the cause: the Federal Reserve’s efforts to flood the
financial markets with dollars. They say the Fed has created an unusual
environment where investors essentially have two choices — hold onto
dollars or buy something, anything else.
The connections between assets have been growing as investors become
more fixated on how and when the Fed will turn off the spigot.
The intensity of the links “tells me there is a lot of nervousness
and a lot of fast money,” says Michael O’Rourke, a market strategist at
BTIG.
As a result, some believe the markets are in a new bubble, driven by
interest rates essentially at zero, which will pop sooner rather than
later. That camp includes Pimco’s Bill Gross, who last week wrote that
the six-month rally in riskier assets, spurred on by the Fed and U.S.
Treasury, “is likely at its pinnacle.”
Originally published at Naked Capitalism and reproduced here with the author's permission.
Opinions and comments on RGE EconoMonitors do not necessarily
reflect the views of Roubini Global Economics, LLC, which encourages a
free-ranging debate among its own analysts and our EconoMonitor
community. RGE takes no responsibility for verifying the accuracy of
any opinions expressed by outside contributors. We encourage
cross-linking but must insist that no forwarding, reprinting,
republication or any other redistribution of RGE content is permissible
without expressed consent of RGE.