Richard Bernstein has done a huge reversal in the last few
months from touting low-risk stocks to high-beta ones. He has gone from
a preference for consumer staples to one for consumer cyclicals (XLY).
And he has gone from lugubrious doubter of a sustainable recovery to an
almost V-shaped optimism.
What is remarkable about the transformation is the dichotomy
between his views and his former Merrill Lynch colleague David
Rosenberg’s. The two were tied at the hip at Merrill, producing
research that was out of step with the bullish consensus yet
painstakingly substantiated.
Just five months ago, back in May, I caught Bernstein on Bloomberg
and he was questioning whether we would get any recovery at all. I wrote then:
Richard Bernstein asks a very good question in a
wide-ranging interview with Bloomberg. Now that the so-called green
shoots are dominating the news coverage and the S&P 500 is up a
massive 34% from its March lows, one might think we are due for a
pretty Robust V-shaped recovery. Is that what the future holds?
Bernstein doesn’t think so. He thinks the recovery will be more
muted than most people think. For this recovery to have any legs
Bernstein believes we need to move away from the “credit-induced”
dynamic of the previous 5 to 15 years. This necessarily means that
financials will not be leaders in a sustainable bull market because we
will have a lot less leverage in the system. This also means that the
core earnings power in the sector is a lot less than people think.
Bernstein thinks the financial sector has gotten way ahead of itself –
a view I am beginning to share after today’s junk rally.
Bernstein went on to say that there was still huge overcapacity in
financial services and that we needed to shed this capacity if we
wanted to see a good return on investments in the sector. At the time,
I was more bullish on the financial sector (although I also worried
expectations were getting ahead of themselves; I am now bearish). I saw
upside because the overcapacity coupled with low interest rates was an
invitation to seek risk, a view that has been borne out in recent
months.
As to the bailouts and the government plan, Bernstein
believes that the government is attempting to keep the excess capacity
in the financial sector alive. His basic point is that bubbles create
overcapacity (think tech stocks). This is the case in finance. The
sector must shrink. In my own, there are only two ways a sector in
over-capacity can perform. They can have poor earnings (Bernstein’s
first point) or they can seek heavy risk taking and reach for yield.
Just as I am switching the other way, so too is Bernstein. Witness the latest Bernstein appearance on CNBC
last week.
It seems even the most bearish market mavens can’t fight
the bullish momentum in this stock market. Wait until you find out
who’s now a buyer of stocks.
Richard Bernstein, the former Merrill Lynch chief investment
strategist, and one of the biggest bears we know is changing his tune.
People like me have underestimated the rebound, Bernstein says. What’s made him a believer?
You might remember the last time Bernstein was on Fast Money he told
the traders – at the foundation of the stock market and the recovery
is jobs. The market can’t sustain itself unless people are brining
home the bacon.
And although the unemployment rate continues to rise Bernstein is
more focused on initial jobless claims which he and many others
consider a leading indicator. And that number has started to decline.
In fact, when they were reported last week new jobless claims
dropped to the lowest level since January. And that trend combined with
low inflation likely means Americans will regain their appetite for
spending.
Another way of saying that is – the economy is slowly getting
better. “if you believe in the recovery this is the prime time to be a
value investor.”
Bernstein added that one wants to load up on risk now if one
believes in the recovery. Junky names are the best as they have more
leverage to a rebound. This is certainly the play right now (but I
think it has more to do with interest rates than recovery). I had seen
Bernstein saying exactly this last month, but he was not yet confident
that the jobs picture had turned. Apparently, he is now and recommends
going all-in, a recommendation I would view with skepticism.
Originally published at
Credit Writedowns and reproduced here with the author's permission.
Opinions and comments on RGE EconoMonitors do not necessarily
reflect the views of Roubini Global Economics, LLC, which encourages a
free-ranging debate among its own analysts and our EconoMonitor
community. RGE takes no responsibility for verifying the accuracy of
any opinions expressed by outside contributors. We encourage
cross-linking but must insist that no forwarding, reprinting,
republication or any other redistribution of RGE content is permissible
without expressed consent of RGE.