Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter

sign up

Have We Passed the Turning point for Oil?

Rachel Ziemba | Jul 18, 2008

Oil futures fell by about $16 over the last four days and about $11 this week, the largest weekly oil price fall in dollar terms. So is the beginning of the end of the oil surge of recent months?

It could be. Fears of long-term scarcity have made oil seem like a more and more attractive financial asset, especially in current market conditions. But if this bet starts being questioned, with fears that high prices and a slowing economy might erode oil demand growth, it could lead to a significant selloff.

Until now mostly its been a supply story, but the demand side may now be drawing more attention - or rather the prospect of lower demand. U.S. economic weakness, and a build in crude oil (and gasoline) inventories this week looked pretty bearish to some. Also this week OPEC suggested that a decrease in demand was imminent for 2009, the first such decline in demand for its oil since 2002.

Furthermore, others suggested that the 'geopolitical' premium might be decreasing - News that the U.S. was considering opening an interests section in Iran may be a strategic opening or at least a sign that a strike might occur in the near future. The fear of ever rising gas prices might have prompted a more pragmatic approach towards Iran and a more pragmatic approach towards its role in the oil market. While Iran is unlikely to hesitate to defend itself, it needs to export oil as much as the world needs its oil, particularly as oil revenues have offset the effect of sanctions.

The big story of the past few years has been the steady slowing of supply growth (particularly lackluster non-OPEC growth) and erosion of OPEC surplus capacity at the same time that demand continued to grow sharply, driven in large part by emerging markets in Asia and increasingly from oil exporters themselves. This erosion of surplus capacity made any supply disruptions (especially any concerning light sweet crude) that much more concerning. So the prospects of more supply in the short term as demand falls, plus the potential strategic opening between Iran and the U.S. may have contributed to this weeks sell-off

But even if demand is getting attention, just as fundamentals didn't seem to explain the whole story of the price surge, neither did its decline. The sell-off wasn't necessarily triggered by a decrease in demand but rather worries about future demand, something that's harder to predict. And while demand seems to be slowing, it might not fall that much. Some portion of oil demand is inelastic in the short-term at least.

In fact we may be seeing non-traditional fundamentals come into play. Investors may be taking a microscope to the drivers of the oil boom – limited surplus capacity today, scarcity in the future, dollar weakness contributing to a higher oil price in dollars to pay for non-dollar imports – and a set of calculations based on the relative return from converting resource assets into financial ones (a topic much discussed on the RGE Economonitors)

With interest rates low and the dollar weak, and prospect of more oil scarcity in the next 5+ years and thus higher prices, many oil producers may prefer to keep the oil in the ground not to invest in finding and extracting it. This perpetuates supply pressures (discouraging investment) keeping the price strong now and in the future. It also means that oil market dynamics decouple from old signals, potentially leading to a new set of fundamentals.

There are some caveats to such a scenario - global growth and oil demand might slow less than expected (the IMF just revised its 2008/9 forecasts up, suggesting that many economies might take longer to slow than expected). Despite its costs, oil demand from emerging markets could remain strong. On the supply side, unanticipated supply disruptions or delays could support a higher oil price. And the uncertainty of information, and current financial climate, it seems like a no-brainer to assume more volatility ahead.

Costs have risen. Production costs in all countries are rising, even in countries like Kuwait. And restrictions on investment mean that many of the most expensive sources are receiving a lot of investment. See for example the new investment in Canada's oil sands – or the attention being paid to shale oil in the U.S. the latter is very costly and not yet commercially viable . Yet the rising cost of an additional barrel of oil does not seem to explain recent prices. It does likely mean that we may have a new price floor, much higher than that of 5 years ago.

But we don't really know how these fundamentals will interact – but if demand for oil falls and all indications suggest it might, lower prices will be the result - the question is how far they will fall. Another somewhat related pressure point concerns demand for the dollar particularly from emerging market central banks and sovereign wealth funds, the largest financiers of the U.S.

Some of the largest central banks are now publicly questioning the value of their amassed dollar assets. Henny Sender of the FT reports that several sovereign funds have cut dollar holdings and others are publicly questioning the value of amassed dollar assets. While it surprised me to think that any GCC government investment funds still had over 80% of its assets in U.S. dollars as recently as last year, her article illustrates a key trend – the attempts to diversify the sovereign wealth of nations and the strains on the dollar pegs and heavily managed currencies of many emerging economies. Overall sovereign wealth funds have been diversifying and will try to continue to diversify. Yet, with dollar pegs, the overall asset allocation is constrained. So the actors to watch are actually the central banks. For example assets accumulated by the central bank of the UAE grew by about $50 billion or about as much as the assets of non-reserve official assets. China's central bank assets also grew faster than the CIC. Any significant shift away from dollar assets could put even more downward pressure on the dollar. Lots of breaking points to watch but the transition might not be in a clear trajectory either for fx markets or oil. If the U.S. and global economies, slow, its hard to imagine commodity prices staying strong.

One thing seems likely, recent oil prices are high enough to start changing behaviour. People are using more transit, trying to decrease gas. U.S. oil imports were down in June (though they may be up in July.) and this downward shift in demand, coupled with inventories that are on the high side for the season in Europe and Asia, as well as the fact that an increase in regulated prices might slow the pace of demand growth in emerging markets – does suggest a decrease in the demand for oil. But that aside, expensive oil (if not $140+ oil) is here to stay in part because of rising costs of new supply and because oil exporters require an increasingly higher sum to settle their import bills and pay for imports. But that doesn't mean it will necessarily be over $130...

Comments
Good effort to provide an overview of the price drivers. But left out is the evidence that the Saudis cannot measurably increase their production over the next five years (see recent leak of Aramco documents to "Business Week"). At the same time, we have the IEA telling us that depletion rates of existing wells are higher than hitherto thought. The IEA is also slated to bring out a reassessment of reserves after the US election. Moreover, we need to think whether the demand destruction going on in the developed economies exceeds new demand by consumers elsewhere. I think the oil-age crisis, like the financial crisis, has hardly played itself out.
Reply to this comment By Anonymous on 2008-07-19 18:22:54
Good piece.

Anonymous,

Spot on comment--not to pun, of course. There rumors re the coming IEA report...not due till later this year. If true, we are in a world of hurt.
Reply to this comment By Stormy on 2008-07-19 19:58:39
I think Ms Zimba's conclusion contradicts her statement that should price drop significantly, producers would opt to hold back production in order to maintain the price.

Since the price has gone parabolic for over a year, its silly not to expect occasional retrenchments. A week or month from now it will be shooting back up again. Volatility is the name of this game.
Reply to this comment By research24 on 2008-07-19 21:40:42
Women dont accept change. I feel sorry for their natural behaviour. They dont understand new paradigm or reality. Hardest lesson of next century.
Make women understand the concept of scarcity.
Reply to this comment By satish on 2008-07-20 00:02:19
Thanks for the comments -
yes there is an inconsistency in the piece, which reflects the differing pressures which in my view are buffeting the oil price.

In part because there is uncertainty of information on supply, demand and costs.

Volatility may be the name of the game, but in my view, absent a major supply shock (withdrawal), I think we may see oil trending downwards, but timing is tough

Anonymous and Stormy, good point about the delayed new supplies - after all we are seeing a lot of projects delayed (Saudi, Kazakhstan etc) hence the IEA projection that in the medium term supply will be tighter than expected.
My views about demand destruction are somewhat short-term since I think over time, globally, energy demand will only rise and there really aren't viable alternatives to oil yet (and many of the new supplies are costly).

It's sure gonna be interesting
Reply to this comment By Rachel on 2008-07-21 08:26:32
Satish - lets try to avoid descending into gender stereotypes. After all, there is some evidence that women actually adapt to scarcity better than men - for example, going without food to ensure that their families have adequate food. but lets try to focus on data on energy supply and demand and how that influences the price outlook

Very interesting post.
The toughest lesson of the next few decades - making all people respond to scarcity and paying the real price of scarce resources
Reply to this comment By Kavitha C on 2008-07-21 08:42:28
The following articles may help assessing the fundamental picture.

Using official or semi-official data for future production: Peak Oil 2011

http://www.aspo-usa.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=415&Itemid=91

Using data collected by a grassroots collaborative survey of projects: Peak Oil 2010

http://canada.theoildrum.com/node/3958
Reply to this comment By RealThink on 2008-07-21 10:55:59
Kavitha
I do accept women adapt to scarcity better than men
and their sacrifial behaviour for the family. I dont know whether they will go in hunger if her neighbour family is facing food shortage.
What I am trying to convey is that they cannot conceive the idea of scarcity. That word is absent in their dictionary.
Reply to this comment By Satish on 2008-07-21 22:41:31
psychology and charts have turned bearish; sell rallies; a break down to 90 and it is still a bull mkt
Reply to this comment By steve brassey on 2008-07-25 08:24:10
I recently explained to my niece that I thought oil prices were driven by supply and demand. I said that some demand destruction has occured resulting in a drop in price.

The other point I made was that area of demand that had been destroyed was the most elastic part. The part of use easiest to stop. The corollary to this is that the next price spike will be higher because the next bit of demand to be destroyed will be a bit that is harder to do without.
Reply to this comment By Simon on 2008-07-30 05:03:32
The Air Jordan 2 model was designed by Bruce Kilgore, and was released during Jordan's third year in NBA. The Air Jordan 2 featured Italian leather, its design was inspired from a 19th century Italian women's boot, the Air Jordans 2 showed a great innovative design just like the Air Jordans 1. The low-tops of Jordan Retro 2 were very popular, and were far from the ordinary basketball shoes. And in the same year, MJ averaged 37.1 points per game in 86-87 NBA season. He became the first player since Wilt Chamberlain to score more than 3,000 points in a season. The Air Jordan 2 was the only series from the Air Jordans line to not originally be released in a black colorway placement. The Air Jordan 2 was also the first Nike sneaker series to not feature the swoosh logo. The Air Jordan 2 was released in the 86-87 NBA season. It is Jordans 3rd year in NBA, he wore the Air Jordans 1 for his first two years.

Reply to this comment By Guest on 2009-11-16 21:57:42
That sounds good, I've learned something from it. I agree with these points. See somenike sb from us, you will find some you like. All are new styles and fashionable. I think you may agree with me that we need Nike Dunks in our lifes. Come and get nike sb.

Reply to this comment By Guest on 2009-11-17 00:06:35
Come here to get your True Religion Jeans. And we also provide ed hardy, please feel free to contact us any time. As the currency in World of Nfl Jerseys, coach is very important. Don't be irresolute, come here to get your ed hardy clothing now. Wanna buy cheap True Religion Jeans? Well, you are so lucky, we have lots of cheap ed hardy in hand. Come here and grab your cheapest ed hardy with fast delivery now.


Reply to this comment By Guest on 2009-11-17 21:00:37
Welcome to visit our store, we've got all brand new Nike air max for you there, all styles are fasionable. We also offer all lines of nike shoes, inluding the air force ones, nike air max, nike dunks, and of course, the timberland boots. The shipping is free for all shoes. 40% off for discount.

Reply to this comment By Guest on 2009-11-18 01:35:28

Post A Comment

You must be logged into the site to post a comment. You may login with your username and password in the upper right hand corner of this page. If you do not have a login, you may register for an account.